Saturday, June 29, 2024
ComponentsTechnology

Comparative Analysis of Sharp NL6448BC26-03 and NEC NL8060BC31-17D LCD Panels

Comparing NEC NL6448BC26-03 and NL8060BC31-17D LCD Modules

Overview

Shunlongwei Co. Ltd. presents two high-quality LCD modules, the NEC NL6448BC26-03 and the NEC NL8060BC31-17D. Both products are designed for industrial applications, offering robust performance and durability.

NEC NL6448BC26-03

  • Resolution: 640 x 480 pixels (VGA)
  • Screen Size: 10.4 inches
  • Brightness: 300 cd/m²
  • Contrast Ratio: 600:1
  • Viewing Angle: 160° horizontal and 140° vertical
  • Interface: TTL
  • Backlight: CCFL (Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp)
  • Response Time: 25 ms
  • Power Consumption: Typically 6.6W

NEC NL8060BC31-17D

  • Resolution: 800 x 600 pixels (SVGA)
  • Screen Size: 12.1 inches
  • Brightness: 450 cd/m²
  • Contrast Ratio: 600:1
  • Viewing Angle: 160° horizontal and 140° vertical
  • Interface: LVDS (Low-Voltage Differential Signaling)
  • Backlight: LED
  • Response Time: 20 ms
  • Power Consumption: Typically 4.6W

Comparison

  1. Resolution and Screen Size
    • The NL8060BC31-17D offers a higher resolution of 800 x 600 pixels compared to the NL6448BC26-03’s 640 x 480 pixels, providing clearer and more detailed images. Additionally, the NL8060BC31-17D has a larger screen size of 12.1 inches, making it suitable for applications requiring larger display areas.
  2. Brightness
    • With a brightness of 450 cd/m², the NL8060BC31-17D is significantly brighter than the NL6448BC26-03, which has a brightness of 300 cd/m². This makes the NL8060BC31-17D better suited for environments with higher ambient light.
  3. Backlight Technology
    • The NL6448BC26-03 uses CCFL backlighting, while the NL8060BC31-17D uses LED backlighting. LED backlighting is generally more energy-efficient, longer-lasting, and provides more uniform brightness compared to CCFL.
  4. Interface
    • The NL6448BC26-03 uses a TTL interface, whereas the NL8060BC31-17D uses an LVDS interface. LVDS is preferred in modern displays for its higher speed and lower power consumption.
  5. Power Consumption
    • The NL8060BC31-17D is more power-efficient, consuming around 4.6W compared to the NL6448BC26-03’s 6.6W. This makes the NL8060BC31-17D more suitable for battery-powered or energy-sensitive applications.
  6. Response Time
    • The NL8060BC31-17D has a faster response time of 20 ms, compared to the NL6448BC26-03’s 25 ms. Faster response times reduce motion blur and are important in dynamic display applications.

Conclusion

Both the NEC NL6448BC26-03 and the NEC NL8060BC31-17D are excellent choices for industrial applications, but they cater to different needs. The NL8060BC31-17D, with its higher resolution, larger screen size, brighter display, and more energy-efficient LED backlight, is ideal for applications requiring detailed and bright displays. On the other hand, the NL6448BC26-03 remains a solid option for those who require a reliable 10.4-inch display with sufficient brightness and contrast.

For more detailed specifications and to place an order, please visit the product pages for the NEC NL6448BC26-03 and the NEC NL8060BC31-17D on the Shunlongwei Co. Ltd. website.

Source:https://www.slw-ele.com/comparative-analysis-of-sharp-nl6448bc26-03-and-nec-nl8060bc31-17d-lcd-panels.html